As i sort of tried to say above.
like for like, and this is coming from watching an engine builder (also fellow RSOCV club member) who specialises in building fast escorts, a 1600 on a low budget can produce more power, and rev better than a pinto with the same low budget spent on it.
This is a guy who builds them with his own custom cam grinds, and engine dynos each engine and tunes them before giving them back to the customer.
a stock 1600 (for arguments sake Ghia spec with 32/36 factory) vs a 2L Ghia Pinto (same carby) makes not much less power than the pinto.
stick a mild cam, some basic porting, balance, side draft carbs into a 1600, and its making some solid power.
its been proven by said engine builder, Pintos take more time, money and work to make the same sort of gains than it does a 1600.
the 1600 is also a lot lighter than a Pinto.
and it is a stronger engine.
An old school trick was to stick 1300 pistons in a 1600. I have a set of 1300 pistons here. It raises the comp ratio significantly.
I wasn’t going to explain why shifting the Pinto back on the mounts Doesn’t work, but Rod already explained it for me.
It also would be mighty close to the heater bubble, if it were to clear at all, when shifted back on the mounts. They are a long engine.
as for engineers, yeah wouldn’t need it.
But there would be expense in upgrading brakes. Im pretty sure a Pinto wont fit with the original Mk1 booster like it is. Or if it does, the headers would be mighty close to the booster arm that bolts to the firewall.