-
Content Count
437 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Mixalis last won the day on April 16 2016
Mixalis had the most liked content!
About Mixalis
-
Rank
Advanced Member
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
Sydney
-
Mixalis reacted to a post in a topic: XF EFI Crossflow Advance Curve
-
Mixalis reacted to a post in a topic: XF EFI Crossflow Advance Curve
-
Mixalis started following Ford Xf Fairmont Ghia (Papou) - Rebuild/Help, XF EFI Crossflow Advance Curve, What are this? and and 1 other
-
gerg reacted to a post in a topic: XF EFI Crossflow Advance Curve
-
Mixalis reacted to a post in a topic: XF EFI Crossflow Advance Curve
-
Hey Steve, Just confirming you do in fact have one of the TFI/EST Hall effect distributors without any mechanical/vac advance systems built in? Regarding the timing curve, I set up a 'curve' (with some advice from @gerg) quite a few years back on my crossflow using a 6al2. It has been quite a while and I never touched it since, but it was effectively linear'ish' between by timing at idle and max timing at WOT RPM (my combo has higher compression, i believe i kept the ceiling somewhere around ~26ish degrees, been a very long time). I spent more time hooking up a 1 BAR MAP sensor to dial in advance at different loads as well which helped with economy. It works fine but hasn't been on a dyno so theres room to improve I then road tuned a 4.0 sohc turbo that I fabricated and wired (Stinger ECU) with a similar curve (at atmospheric) and then dialled the timing back under different boost pressures. When I started tuning the fueling, i had the timing at a static value the entire curve - it drove around absolutely fine. Left the timing till last - took an educated punt based off other people combinations. It works fine, hasn't been on a dyno so definitely has room to improve. Moral of the whole story above - if you're going to a dyno, I honestly wouldn't worry too much about the timing side of it - even a single value across the whole curve will work fine. If you don't have access to a dyno and a knock sensor, you really are just guessing. Even if you rock up to the dyno with a flat timing curve, as long as the dyno operator has a knock sensor (and of course a dyno), then you can hopefully rest assured they will do a good job after you drop the car off. But you've done a great job to sort out the fuelling side from before and also confirm that the ECU knows the position of the engine (timing at ECU is what you see on balancer) - that will surely save you some dyno time money. Really keen to see how you go!
-
Mixalis reacted to a post in a topic: SINGLE RAIL GEARBOX INFO
-
Mixalis reacted to a post in a topic: SINGLE RAIL GEARBOX INFO
-
Mixalis reacted to a post in a topic: SINGLE RAIL GEARBOX INFO
-
Damn... Well i have a mate measuring up an XF bellhousing 250-T5 now so ill know if you're lying, and ill let everyone know as well I swear i will
-
Greg you're a legend as usual. Unfortunately not the answer i was hoping for . Going by the above is it fair to say that the input shaft on an AU T5 is in fact longer than the input shaft on any other T5/single rail in early for 6's? In other words, is the 250 crossflow T5 bell housing (suit XF) the same depth as 250 crossflow single rail, and in turn shallower than the AU T5 bell housing?
-
Hi guys reviving this thread. Does anyone happen to have the measurement for the length of a single rail input shaft (cortina if it makes any difference?) Mainly after the length between the tip of the input shaft to the face of the transmission case. Further to that, do we know if the measurement above is exactly the same as what is found in the T5? Thank you in advance
-
eattsie9 reacted to a post in a topic: What are this?
-
deano551 reacted to a post in a topic: What are this?
-
351XD_Fairmont reacted to a post in a topic: What are this?
-
SPArKy_Dave reacted to a post in a topic: What are this?
-
Hahaha I think we’ve been hanging around the forums too long Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Going to beat everyone in to it, make sure it’s a standard volume oil pump not high volume ! [emoji3] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Full Papou spec love it ! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Awesome work keen to see how it all turns out! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
All good, it’s for a slight lope to it; doesn’t really have that rough sound to it, entry level chop if we can call it that hahaha. Considering what others are saying regarding the limits on the stock ecu, I don’t think you’ll be getting too much lope either on idle unfortunately... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Hahaha that’s mad chuck us some photos if you like! The dizzy gear you need for aftermarket cams in crossflow is the Crow DG2. I’m running a Crow 14892 which is 214@0.05” and .510” lift on a 112 lobe You in Sydney area by any chance ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Hey mate all solid advice here. Agree with Greg, definitely do valve springs seems to be the general consensus. My cam is a little bigger and I’ve gotten away with standard rockers and standard pushrods without a problem turning to 5000rpm. So if you’re going for a little upgrade using standard efi then I can’t imagine you would need anything more than new valve springs. Also don’t forget the crow dizzy gear as well as well when going aftermarket cam! Btw love the username [emoji23] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
The quickest import radial car in the world runs one of those too Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Ah ok what you want to do is click on his videos, they should be the most recent ones from memory; one has a few million views that’s part 1(the title is radical engine build or something) then part 2 is after it The videos are quite long Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Sorry two L’s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
For anyone interested in more on the 300 cube engines, type in Elisons Machine Shop into Facebook; he’s doing a pull down on an insane aspo one Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk