Jump to content

matt_lamb_160

Members
  • Content Count

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by matt_lamb_160


  1. What is your best guess (or target) of your peak HP, peak HP rpm, peak torque rpm? When does your exhaust valve open (deg BBDC)?

     

    Just guessing some numbers I think you need 1 5/8" primaries, 2 1/4" secondaries and 3.5" exhaust (after around 350HP a 3" exhaust is going to start to cost you).

     

    I will try (time permitting) to come up with more info later.


  2. I get your frustrations mate. Nothing worse than no it alls that really no nothing and not being able to get work done. Possibly the two things I hate the most.

     

    Plus, people need to pay. What is $50 really?

     

    I hope things pick up (they will, it is just a matter of time). People are always afraid to try new people. Perhaps you could get some of your final work flow tested independently? Might give people more confidence?

     

    Before and after engine dyno results? Build an 11sec Cortina with you business name on the side, haha. I am not sure, all the quick ways to build a reputation seem to cost $$$.


  3. Hmm. He said "my head". And I think "free flow" means a free look at Glen's work (R and D) which everyone else needs to pay for (buy a head). You did say you were keen to have a look and take some measurements (sounds kind of like a privilege). It is also a great chance for you to compare your head with what many people once thought to be the best. I am certainly interested in the comparison once you finish your head. Xrglen's name seems to blow innocent statements out of proportion, he must have really burnt some people.


  4. Thom's advice is pretty good I think. Our OHS guys tell you no gloves for angle grinders but I just read SafeWork's (SA) guide for angle grinders and it says "Well-fitted gloves that allow a good grip of the tool". Gloves are a definite no no for bench grinders.

     

    6321.jpg


  5. Exhaust to inlet ratios should never go below 60%, high ratios (above 80%) are not a concern so long as you are not giving up inlet flow to improve the exhaust. There is a heap of stuff in technical papers/books that came mostly out of MIT back in the day (Charles Taylor mostly) and have since been supported by people like Vizard and Bell.

     

    I would not be worried about low lift ratios of 85% (not that this will be an issue in your case) and would be trying to make sure I had at least 70% most of the time. I would consider the ideal 75% as an average value over the whole lift cycle which can be altered by the cam and/or the head.

     

    In your application you need to analyse the ratio with the inlet manifold on and you will need to make the assumption that, on the exhaust side, the head is the most restrictive item. Then make sure you don't get less than 70%. Chances are the stock exhaust valve size will be ok.

     

    Also the point you make about the higher lift lobe and fat part of the cam is exactly what I was trying to say and is why I recommended up to 0.55" lift.


  6. I like that you have to work with a restriction, means you need to do it right. Your head achieves the manifold flow at less than 0.35" lift. In lift versus flow terms you don't really need more than 0.45"-0.5" lift. But then how do you get the duration you need and a fast ramp rate if you have such low lift? I would be aiming for 0.5"-0.55" lift with as flat a nose as possible (but this would require a helpful cam grinder). Running more lift will give the same flow but will require the engine to do more work (as Ando said). I would also be running wide-ish lobe separation (110 or so deg.) to help with the restrictive intake. The head's ports are better than they need to be, but because the cross-section has been maintained there will be no negative effects. The low lift mods are all that was really required, but this head is a great all rounder and will work with much better intakes as mentioned above.

     

    We need square cam lobes and some magic way of keeping the lifters on them, haha.


  7. No way it can groove the crank, the balancer maybe but not the crank. They are trying to rip you.

     

    Not that hard to do, but takes a while. If you do it buy a puller to get the harmonic balancer off before you start.

     

    Talk to your neighbour and see what he says, if he's not keen you have to take it somewhere or put up with the drip. If it is not using a noticeable amount of oil I wouldn't be too worried about it.


  8. Thanks mate, agreed extra flanges are asking for leaks.

     

    Looking at making a manifold (low mount high gate) now or getting a good cast log one.

     

    KLR250's old low mount mani had the wastegate between number 5 and 6. Mine will be in the centre but it just shows what can 'work' (on logs at least).


  9. This is something alot of people should take on board,always wear your PPE.You might feel like a dork wearing it at home when no-ones around but we all need to be thinking safety first.After a while you get use to it and it's benefits...

     

    I wear riggers gloves,safety glasses,ear muffs,long sleeves and long pants doing any welding cutting/grinding jobs.

    I wouldn't be wearing gloves when grinding, or cutting if it is an angle grider. Can be nasty.

     

    I am new fan of saftey goggles, even just working under my dirt riden Falcon they are good.


  10. With a 3 angle seat and with just some reshaping around the short turn and the right hand side wall just before the short turn and leaving the valve guide basically alone and no chamber work I made 202cfm at 550. If you did the chamber work as I did it above you will gain throughout the low and mid lift as well on top which is what we want even more so with a shorter cam.

     

    SAM_2733_zps46a086cf.jpg

    That's what I thought, but could not prove. Basically the extra port work is only required if you have over 0.55" lift. Agree on the chamber work, it has made an even bigger difference than I thought it would and is important for any engine.


  11. Do you think guide shaping has much of an influence under 0.5"-0.55" lift? Do you recon you'd get 200cfm without it? This is interesting for high k engines with modest lift cams and turbo builds.

     

    Good work again. You have shown real evidence that you are searching for what makes the biggest difference and not just opening every up and saying "it must work, the car does 12s". Restricted classes of racing are best for separating who knows and who doesn't. Keep showing your efforts and I think it will pay off.

×